From: [...] Daniel Vainsencher Sent: 01 January 2006 19:43
Daniel, what's the date on your machine? Is something off with its conversion to Gregorian somewhere?
It might not be good enough for money handling or legally binding stuff, but it probably is for all kinds of decisions the community is trying to make now.
Quite.
Do you mind updating the minnow page to reflect these requirements?
Done; sorry for the delay. I've hacked with some headings, now that we have more content in there - sorry if that's an issue.
Here I don't quite understand your intention. Do you mean to extend SqP itself?
Ideally.
note that it is not Squeak, so some Squeakers won't hack it directly.
<shrug>. And? A system is a system is a system.
I've CC'ed Cees into this. Cees, what's SqP written in and how easy is it (in your experience) to change?
Anyway, I think the first thing is to make sure we can live with the initial requirements list, and then let move to implementation. For that I was going to ask on the Squeak list for volunteers, unless one of you wants to tackle it yourselves. In the case where someone else is doing it, there's no point in making too many implementation decisions now.
I could do it quickly but not in Squeak, or in Squeak but slowly - I'm not sufficiently familiar with any of the Smalltalk Web frameworks to use them effectively. My day job is almost entirely Microsoft web application hacking (for my sins - but it pays the bills!)
- Peter