Hi!
Sorry for late reply.
"Ron Teitelbaum" Ron@USMedRec.com wrote:
Hi G=F6ran,
Can you add Dan=92s name to the list of questions? Maybe Monday would = be a good day to encourage candidates to answer questions.
Yep, done! :)
We should set up a test election; we need the wording of emails that goes out. This is what we had last year:
Squeak Foundation Board Elections 2007
The 7 highest rated candidates from the list will comprise the Squeak
Foundation Board starting from the end of voting, and for a year. = Remember that your vote is considered as a ranking of all candidates. The virtual candidate "None Of The Above" should only be ranked over candidates that = you would prefer not to see in the Board at all. Some of the candidates have posted information about themselves and their candidacy on the = squeak-dev list or other places. The official 2007 elections site includes some information, and is at: http://wiki.squeak.org/squeak/5920 (note in case = of a tie: final Results will follow The Condorcet completion rule: CIVS = Ranked Pairs)
What do you think, should we change anything besides the link and the = date?
No, I think that would do fine. Possibly adjust the "some of the candidates" depending on what they will do. :)
Do we know how to "set up a test election"? Who should I talk to? Ken? You? Daniel?
I also took a peek at the list of Apprentices (great Ken!) and we should go through that and try to warn people etc without valid emails. I can do that stuff.
regards, Göran