A new version of System was added to project The Inbox:
http://source.squeak.org/inbox/System-cmm.756.mcz
==================== Summary ====================
Name: System-cmm.756
Author: cmm
Time: 5 August 2015, 8:08:16.737 pm
UUID: db631a26-1d20-4e39-966b-cb9b59755b7f
Ancestors: System-cmm.755
CompiledMethod>>#hasBreakpoint was moved back to Kernel.
=============== Diff against System-cmm.755 ===============
Item was removed:
- ----- Method: CompiledMethod>>hasBreakpoint (in category '*System-Tools-debugger support-override') -----
- hasBreakpoint
- ^BreakpointManager methodHasBreakpoint: self!
A new version of Kernel was added to project The Inbox:
http://source.squeak.org/inbox/Kernel-cmm.937.mcz
==================== Summary ====================
Name: Kernel-cmm.937
Author: cmm
Time: 5 August 2015, 8:06:28.072 pm
UUID: 191e34d9-22d7-4e46-ac5d-cb3cd9baf203
Ancestors: Kernel-cmm.936
- #hasBreakpoint is now needed by Kernel, but must be able to operate independently of System's BreakpointManager.
=============== Diff against Kernel-cmm.936 ===============
Item was changed:
+ ----- Method: CompiledMethod>>hasBreakpoint (in category '*Kernel-tool support') -----
- ----- Method: CompiledMethod>>hasBreakpoint (in category 'testing') -----
hasBreakpoint
+ ^ self class environment
+ at: #BreakpointManager
+ ifPresent: [:bpm | bpm methodHasBreakpoint: self]
+ ifAbsent: [false]!
- ^false!
On 05.08.2015, at 21:41, commits(a)source.squeak.org wrote:
> A new version of Kernel was added to project The Inbox:
> http://source.squeak.org/inbox/Kernel-cmm.937.mcz
>
> ==================== Summary ====================
>
> Name: Kernel-cmm.937
> Author: cmm
> Time: 5 August 2015, 4:41:15.204 pm
> UUID: 874460df-769a-4381-8d3e-29c2e118b7f6
> Ancestors: Kernel-cmm.936
>
> Move CompiledMethod>>#hasBreakpoint back to Kernel where it belongs.
Questionable, as BreakpointManager is (rightfully) not in Kernel…
(apart from the private reply) what about
hasBreakpoint
^ self class environment
at: #BreakpointManager
ifPresent: [:bpm | bpm methodHasBreakpoint: self]
ifAbsent: [false]
?
Best regards
-Tobias
A new version of System was added to project The Inbox:
http://source.squeak.org/inbox/System-cmm.756.mcz
==================== Summary ====================
Name: System-cmm.756
Author: cmm
Time: 5 August 2015, 4:46:49.93 pm
UUID: 5ec8c2f7-f93d-4162-81dc-306f5961725a
Ancestors: System-cmm.755
Move CompiledMethod>>#hasBreakpoint back to Kernel where it belongs.
=============== Diff against System-cmm.755 ===============
Item was removed:
- ----- Method: CompiledMethod>>hasBreakpoint (in category '*System-Tools-debugger support-override') -----
- hasBreakpoint
- ^BreakpointManager methodHasBreakpoint: self!
A new version of Kernel was added to project The Inbox:
http://source.squeak.org/inbox/Kernel-cmm.937.mcz
==================== Summary ====================
Name: Kernel-cmm.937
Author: cmm
Time: 5 August 2015, 4:41:15.204 pm
UUID: 874460df-769a-4381-8d3e-29c2e118b7f6
Ancestors: Kernel-cmm.936
Move CompiledMethod>>#hasBreakpoint back to Kernel where it belongs.
=============== Diff against Kernel-cmm.936 ===============
Item was changed:
+ ----- Method: CompiledMethod>>hasBreakpoint (in category '*kernel') -----
- ----- Method: CompiledMethod>>hasBreakpoint (in category 'testing') -----
hasBreakpoint
+ ^BreakpointManager methodHasBreakpoint: self!
- ^false!
The squeaksource.com home page presents a warning that out of date. I
would like to update that message with something more appropriate. The
home page currently says this:
Note: The creation of new projects has been disabled. If you would like
to create a new project please consider moving to: http://ss3.gemstone.com/
or http://www.smalltalkhub.com/.
And it might be better to say something like this:
Note: If you would like to create a new project please consider using
http://ss3.gemstone.com/.
Rationale: New project creation is no longer disabled on squeaksource.com.
The smalltalkhub.com site is still beta so I am not sure that it should
be recommended. The ss3.gemstone.com seems to be solid and well supported.
Does that sound right? Advice is welcome.
Thanks,
Dave
Sean P. DeNigris wrote
> In case anyone hasn't heard, Google Code will shut down entirely on
> January 25, 2016.
UPDATE: Impending Deadline: "Google Code will be turning read-only on August
25th"
Already Moved:
magritte-metamodel
phratch
seaside
metacello
Unknown:
moose-technology
marsonpharo
nativeboost
squeaksource3
-----
Cheers,
Sean
--
View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/Google-Code-Shutdown-tp4840718.html
Sent from the Squeak - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.