Please disregard the attachment in my prior submission and use this one. It fixes the implementor rather than requiring all the senders to perform a nil guard.
- Chris
On Mar 26, 2004, at 12:49 PM, Chris Muller wrote:
Please disregard the attachment in my prior submission and use this one. It fixes the implementor rather than requiring all the senders to perform a nil guard.
Since this is for the image, you should probably repost it as a FIX. In the meantime, I've integrated your previous patch into PackageInfo on SM.
Avi
squeak-dev@lists.squeakfoundation.org