Hi
I was wondering wether it was me but I tried
Date today = 'nil' and I get a DNU. I thought that = should be more robust and that we should not expect to have both objects of the same class.
Stef
On Mar 26, 2006, at 20:30 , Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
Hi
I was wondering wether it was me but I tried
Date today = 'nil'
and I get a DNU. I thought that = should be more robust and that we should not expect to have both objects of the same class.
yes, I would expect the same. In a 3.9a 7020 image this works correctly. Which image version do you have?
Adrian
On 26 mars 06, at 20:47, Adrian Lienhard wrote:
On Mar 26, 2006, at 20:30 , Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
Hi
I was wondering wether it was me but I tried
Date today = 'nil'
and I get a DNU. I thought that = should be more robust and that we should not expect to have both objects of the same class.
yes, I would expect the same. In a 3.9a 7020 image this works correctly. Which image version do you have?
an old 3.8 image :) because I did not wanted to reload everything....
Stef
Adrian
Le Dimanche 26 Mars 2006 20:47, Adrian Lienhard a écrit :
On Mar 26, 2006, at 20:30 , Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
Hi
I was wondering wether it was me but I tried
Date today = 'nil'
and I get a DNU. I thought that = should be more robust and that we should not expect to have both objects of the same class.
yes, I would expect the same. In a 3.9a 7020 image this works correctly. Which image version do you have?
Adrian
I profit from this one to remind you that
1 i = nil
still fail in a 3.9a 7020 image, and this is related to
http://bugs.impara.de/view.php?id=2688
Complex should check for #isNumberExtension before sending #adaptToComplex:andSend:, or otherwise trap the DNU...
Nicolas
squeak-dev@lists.squeakfoundation.org
-
Adrian Lienhard -
nicolas cellier -
stéphane ducasse -
Stéphane Ducasse