Am 25.02.2013 um 21:27 schrieb commits@source.squeak.org:
Frank Shearar uploaded a new version of SMLoader to project The Trunk: http://source.squeak.org/trunk/SMLoader-fbs.78.mcz
==================== Summary ====================
Name: SMLoader-fbs.78 Author: fbs Time: 25 February 2013, 9:27:11.959 pm UUID: cd8023fe-60a1-4dd9-a7dd-60e8ce7f4ac5 Ancestors: SMLoader-cmm.77
When installing WebClient, use the most recent version.
=============== Diff against SMLoader-cmm.77 ===============
Item was changed: SystemOrganization addCategory: #SMLoader!
- SystemOrganization addCategory: #'SMLoader-Models'!
Item was changed: ----- Method: SMClient class>>installWebClient (in category 'private') ----- installWebClient
- Installer ss
project: 'WebClient';
install: 'WebClient-Core-ar.92.mcz'!
Shouldn't this be WebClient-Core-ar.92 without the .mcz?
- (Installer repository: 'http://www.squeaksource.com/WebClient')
install: 'WebClient-Core-ar.83'!
Best -Tobias
On 26 February 2013 06:38, Tobias Pape Das.Linux@gmx.de wrote:
Am 25.02.2013 um 21:27 schrieb commits@source.squeak.org:
Frank Shearar uploaded a new version of SMLoader to project The Trunk: http://source.squeak.org/trunk/SMLoader-fbs.78.mcz
==================== Summary ====================
Name: SMLoader-fbs.78 Author: fbs Time: 25 February 2013, 9:27:11.959 pm UUID: cd8023fe-60a1-4dd9-a7dd-60e8ce7f4ac5 Ancestors: SMLoader-cmm.77
When installing WebClient, use the most recent version.
=============== Diff against SMLoader-cmm.77 ===============
Item was changed: SystemOrganization addCategory: #SMLoader!
- SystemOrganization addCategory: #'SMLoader-Models'!
Item was changed: ----- Method: SMClient class>>installWebClient (in category 'private') ----- installWebClient
Installer ss
project: 'WebClient';
install: 'WebClient-Core-ar.92.mcz'!
Shouldn't this be WebClient-Core-ar.92 without the .mcz?
Yes, it should, but without the .mcz you'd end up loading WebClient-Core-ar.921.mcz by accident, were there such a version.
frank
(Installer repository: 'http://www.squeaksource.com/WebClient')
install: 'WebClient-Core-ar.83'!
Best -Tobias
Am 26.02.2013 um 08:19 schrieb Frank Shearar frank.shearar@gmail.com:
On 26 February 2013 06:38, Tobias Pape Das.Linux@gmx.de wrote:
Am 25.02.2013 um 21:27 schrieb commits@source.squeak.org:
Frank Shearar uploaded a new version of SMLoader to project The Trunk: http://source.squeak.org/trunk/SMLoader-fbs.78.mcz
==================== Summary ====================
Name: SMLoader-fbs.78 Author: fbs Time: 25 February 2013, 9:27:11.959 pm UUID: cd8023fe-60a1-4dd9-a7dd-60e8ce7f4ac5 Ancestors: SMLoader-cmm.77
When installing WebClient, use the most recent version.
=============== Diff against SMLoader-cmm.77 ===============
Item was changed: SystemOrganization addCategory: #SMLoader!
- SystemOrganization addCategory: #'SMLoader-Models'!
Item was changed: ----- Method: SMClient class>>installWebClient (in category 'private') ----- installWebClient
Installer ss
project: 'WebClient';
install: 'WebClient-Core-ar.92.mcz'!
Shouldn't this be WebClient-Core-ar.92 without the .mcz?
Yes, it should, but without the .mcz you'd end up loading WebClient-Core-ar.921.mcz by accident, were there such a version.
Then I would like to declare Installer broken. ;) Rephrased: This would be unexpected behavior for me
Best -Tobias
On 26 February 2013 07:23, Tobias Pape Das.Linux@gmx.de wrote:
Am 26.02.2013 um 08:19 schrieb Frank Shearar frank.shearar@gmail.com:
On 26 February 2013 06:38, Tobias Pape Das.Linux@gmx.de wrote:
Am 25.02.2013 um 21:27 schrieb commits@source.squeak.org:
Frank Shearar uploaded a new version of SMLoader to project The Trunk: http://source.squeak.org/trunk/SMLoader-fbs.78.mcz
==================== Summary ====================
Name: SMLoader-fbs.78 Author: fbs Time: 25 February 2013, 9:27:11.959 pm UUID: cd8023fe-60a1-4dd9-a7dd-60e8ce7f4ac5 Ancestors: SMLoader-cmm.77
When installing WebClient, use the most recent version.
=============== Diff against SMLoader-cmm.77 ===============
Item was changed: SystemOrganization addCategory: #SMLoader!
- SystemOrganization addCategory: #'SMLoader-Models'!
Item was changed: ----- Method: SMClient class>>installWebClient (in category 'private') ----- installWebClient
Installer ss
project: 'WebClient';
install: 'WebClient-Core-ar.92.mcz'!
Shouldn't this be WebClient-Core-ar.92 without the .mcz?
Yes, it should, but without the .mcz you'd end up loading WebClient-Core-ar.921.mcz by accident, were there such a version.
Then I would like to declare Installer broken. ;) Rephrased: This would be unexpected behavior for me
If you raise a bug I'll remember to fix it :) Otherwise my disease-riddled brain will likely forget.
frank
Best -Tobias
Am 26.02.2013 um 08:28 schrieb Frank Shearar frank.shearar@gmail.com:
On 26 February 2013 07:23, Tobias Pape Das.Linux@gmx.de wrote:
Am 26.02.2013 um 08:19 schrieb Frank Shearar frank.shearar@gmail.com:
On 26 February 2013 06:38, Tobias Pape Das.Linux@gmx.de wrote:
Yes, it should, but without the .mcz you'd end up loading WebClient-Core-ar.921.mcz by accident, were there such a version.
Then I would like to declare Installer broken. ;) Rephrased: This would be unexpected behavior for me
If you raise a bug I'll remember to fix it :) Otherwise my disease-riddled brain will likely forget.
you mean on mantis? To be frank, I have no idea how to. I find mantis most puzzeling :/
Best -tobias
On 26 February 2013 07:43, Tobias Pape Das.Linux@gmx.de wrote:
Am 26.02.2013 um 08:28 schrieb Frank Shearar frank.shearar@gmail.com:
On 26 February 2013 07:23, Tobias Pape Das.Linux@gmx.de wrote:
Am 26.02.2013 um 08:19 schrieb Frank Shearar frank.shearar@gmail.com:
On 26 February 2013 06:38, Tobias Pape Das.Linux@gmx.de wrote:
Yes, it should, but without the .mcz you'd end up loading WebClient-Core-ar.921.mcz by accident, were there such a version.
Then I would like to declare Installer broken. ;) Rephrased: This would be unexpected behavior for me
If you raise a bug I'll remember to fix it :) Otherwise my disease-riddled brain will likely forget.
you mean on mantis? To be frank, I have no idea how to. I find mantis most puzzeling :/
Really? It's very retro chic, but I've always found its interface to be more or less navigable. It _has_ been a very long time since I learned Mantis though, to be fair.
So I raised the ticket for you: http://bugs.squeak.org/view.php?id=7742
frank
Best -tobias
On 26 February 2013 09:10, Frank Shearar frank.shearar@gmail.com wrote:
On 26 February 2013 07:43, Tobias Pape Das.Linux@gmx.de wrote:
Am 26.02.2013 um 08:28 schrieb Frank Shearar frank.shearar@gmail.com:
On 26 February 2013 07:23, Tobias Pape Das.Linux@gmx.de wrote:
Am 26.02.2013 um 08:19 schrieb Frank Shearar frank.shearar@gmail.com:
On 26 February 2013 06:38, Tobias Pape Das.Linux@gmx.de wrote:
Yes, it should, but without the .mcz you'd end up loading WebClient-Core-ar.921.mcz by accident, were there such a version.
Then I would like to declare Installer broken. ;) Rephrased: This would be unexpected behavior for me
If you raise a bug I'll remember to fix it :) Otherwise my disease-riddled brain will likely forget.
you mean on mantis? To be frank, I have no idea how to. I find mantis most puzzeling :/
Really? It's very retro chic, but I've always found its interface to be more or less navigable. It _has_ been a very long time since I learned Mantis though, to be fair.
So I raised the ticket for you: http://bugs.squeak.org/view.php?id=7742
Bert, while InstallerMonticello has always behaved this way, you touched this (InstallerMonticello >> #mcDetectFileBlock:) last - before I rip out its guts, are there any gotchas I might miss? Is it _desirable_ to match 'Collections-fbs.489' when trying to install 'Collections-fbs.48'?
frank
Best -tobias
Am 26.02.2013 um 10:10 schrieb Frank Shearar frank.shearar@gmail.com:
On 26 February 2013 07:43, Tobias Pape Das.Linux@gmx.de wrote:
Am 26.02.2013 um 08:28 schrieb Frank Shearar frank.shearar@gmail.com:
On 26 February 2013 07:23, Tobias Pape Das.Linux@gmx.de wrote:
If you raise a bug I'll remember to fix it :) Otherwise my disease-riddled brain will likely forget.
you mean on mantis? To be frank, I have no idea how to. I find mantis most puzzeling :/
Really? It's very retro chic, but I've always found its interface to be more or less navigable. It _has_ been a very long time since I learned Mantis though, to be fair.
So I raised the ticket for you: http://bugs.squeak.org/view.php?id=7742
Thank you for that :)
Best -Tobias
On 2013-02-26, at 08:19, Frank Shearar frank.shearar@gmail.com wrote:
On 26 February 2013 06:38, Tobias Pape Das.Linux@gmx.de wrote:
Am 25.02.2013 um 21:27 schrieb commits@source.squeak.org:
installWebClient
Installer ss
project: 'WebClient';
install: 'WebClient-Core-ar.92.mcz'!
Shouldn't this be WebClient-Core-ar.92 without the .mcz?
Yes, it should, but without the .mcz you'd end up loading WebClient-Core-ar.921.mcz by accident, were there such a version.
frank
Really? I thought we fixed the matching from stupid strings to something more intelligent a while ago?
- Bert -
On 26 February 2013 11:36, Bert Freudenberg bert@freudenbergs.de wrote:
On 2013-02-26, at 08:19, Frank Shearar frank.shearar@gmail.com wrote:
On 26 February 2013 06:38, Tobias Pape Das.Linux@gmx.de wrote:
Am 25.02.2013 um 21:27 schrieb commits@source.squeak.org:
installWebClient
Installer ss
project: 'WebClient';
install: 'WebClient-Core-ar.92.mcz'!
Shouldn't this be WebClient-Core-ar.92 without the .mcz?
Yes, it should, but without the .mcz you'd end up loading WebClient-Core-ar.921.mcz by accident, were there such a version.
frank
Really? I thought we fixed the matching from stupid strings to something more intelligent a while ago?
We did, but we still stupidly match on prefixes of strings generated from MCVersionNames.
frank
- Bert -
squeak-dev@lists.squeakfoundation.org