Open MC browser. Focus on package list. Press and hold down arrow.
It cannot keep up with even a moderate keyboard repeat.
But in Squeak5.0, it can, easily.
Something broke or degraded?
On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 07:00:29PM -0500, Chris Muller wrote:
Open MC browser. Focus on package list. Press and hold down arrow.
It cannot keep up with even a moderate keyboard repeat.
But in Squeak5.0, it can, easily.
Something broke or degraded?
I cannot reproduce in trunk. In what image do you see this problem?
Dave
It's probably #directorySize, which is sent indirectly from MCDirectoryRepository >> #description, being recalculated for your package cache every time the selection changes.
Levente
On Thu, 31 Mar 2016, Chris Muller wrote:
Open MC browser. Focus on package list. Press and hold down arrow.
It cannot keep up with even a moderate keyboard repeat.
But in Squeak5.0, it can, easily.
Something broke or degraded?
Yip, that's it.
On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 11:18 PM, Levente Uzonyi leves@caesar.elte.hu wrote:
It's probably #directorySize, which is sent indirectly from MCDirectoryRepository >> #description, being recalculated for your package cache every time the selection changes.
Levente
On Thu, 31 Mar 2016, Chris Muller wrote:
Open MC browser. Focus on package list. Press and hold down arrow.
It cannot keep up with even a moderate keyboard repeat.
But in Squeak5.0, it can, easily.
Something broke or degraded?
*hmpf* Stoopid model update. Filtering should not re-fetch data from the model. Anyway, I reverted it.
Best, Marcel
-- View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/Monticello-working-copy-list-got-really-slow-tp4887703... Sent from the Squeak - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Its not even just about performance -- this attribute is not something that concerns usage of Monticello at all, certainly not on the UI in that particular place (the repository list). Maybe if you wanted to put it somewhere on the Repository viewer; that might be more appropriate because there you're actually looking at a repository..
On Fri, Apr 1, 2016 at 2:44 AM, marcel.taeumel Marcel.Taeumel@hpi.de wrote:
*hmpf* Stoopid model update. Filtering should not re-fetch data from the model. Anyway, I reverted it.
Best, Marcel
-- View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/Monticello-working-copy-list-got-really-slow-tp4887703... Sent from the Squeak - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Hey Chris,
sure. For me, it made perfect sense there. :-P So many different users out there. We must never forget that! ;-)
Best, Marcel
-- View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/Monticello-working-copy-list-got-really-slow-tp4887703... Sent from the Squeak - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
squeak-dev@lists.squeakfoundation.org