j
: Next unread message k
: Previous unread message j a
: Jump to all threads
j l
: Jump to MailingList overview
On Thu, 01 Jun 2000 14:41:48 +0200 Stefan Matthias Aust sma@3plus4.de wrote:
Can be remove vmTable:at:, yes? It's identical to vmParameterAt: and has no sender. I just ask because perhaps somebody relays on this method.
Stefan,
While the comment may seem similar to that in #vmParameterAt:, it's just plain wrong. Primitive 254 does different things depending on the number of arguments, so #vmTable:at: actually provides functionality identical to #vmParameterAt:put:.
Cheers, Bob
squeak-dev@lists.squeakfoundation.org