7 Sep
7 Sep
12:22 p.m.
On Mon, 27 Aug 2001 23:41:04 +0200, John M McIntosh johnmci@smalltalkconsulting.com wrote:
On day 4 it says
ST/X Compiler not VM
ST/X *has* a VM!
Frank.
8 Sep
8 Sep
9:12 a.m.
Hi Frank,
thanks for correcting this. This ** No VM ** at the slide was meant in the context of the execution of a deployed ( C-translated ) ST/X application. It is better to state that there is no bytecode interpretation in case of ( STC ) compiled Smalltalk. You can mix even compiled and interpreted code.
This was meant as an ** additional feature ** and is of course not a limitation of this great Smalltalk. Sorry I didn't focus much on ST/X .
Frank
8288
Age (days ago)
8300
Last active (days ago)
squeak-dev@lists.squeakfoundation.org
2 comments
3 participants
participants (3)
-
Frank Gerhardt -
Frank Lesser -
John M McIntosh