Slashdot is reporting that the Gnome people have talked Bitstream into licensing a total of ten high-quality fonts for use in free software. I haven't gone to see what the actual license looks like, but I thought it might be worth mentioning here. The press release is at:
http://www.gnome.org/pr-bitstreamfonts.html
G.
Gavin Scott wrote:
Slashdot is reporting that the Gnome people have talked Bitstream into licensing a total of ten high-quality fonts for use in free software. I haven't gone to see what the actual license looks like, but I thought it might be worth mentioning here. The press release is at:
There scalable. It's variations of the Vera font, Mono, Sans, Serif, etc. It's a BSD-ish license (OSI approved alread). What I would like to know is how well populated they are (i.e. how many of glyphs are there).
On Jan 22, 2003 Travis Griggs tgriggs@keyww.com wrote:
Gavin Scott wrote:
Slashdot is reporting that the Gnome people have talked Bitstream into licensing a total of ten high-quality fonts for use in free software. I haven't gone to see what the actual license looks like, but I thought it might be worth mentioning here. The press release is at:
There scalable. It's variations of the Vera font, Mono, Sans, Serif, etc. It's a BSD-ish license (OSI approved alread). What I would like to know is how well populated they are (i.e. how many of glyphs are there).
Today Jim Getty Jim.Gettys@hp.com wrote that the fonts are now downloadable from http://www.gnome.org/fonts . It is now possible to answer the question of Travis:
These fonts contain between 261 and 263 hinted glyphs, and two character to glyph mappings (namely MacIntosh Roman and Microsoft Unicode BMP). If I do not err, all glyphs for MacIntosh Roman, ISO 8859-1 (Latin 1) and windows-1252 are present. The fonts do not support other alphabetic scripts. Note that the presence of the character-to-glyph mapping named "Microsoft Unicode BMP" does not imply support for Unicode; it implies only that the glyphs that are present in the font can be retrieved by their Unicode codepoints.
The font names are: Bitstream Vera Sans Roman Bitstream Vera Sans Oblique Bitstream Vera Sans Bold Bitstream Vera Sans Bold Oblique Bitstream Vera Serif Roman Bitstream Vera Serif Bold Bitstream Vera Sans Mono Roman Bitstream Vera Sans Mono Oblique Bitstream Vera Sans Mono Bold Bitstream Vera Sans Mono Bold Oblique Bitstream Vera Serif Bold
Hope this gives some information about the usablility of these fonts
Guilty as charged :-). To answer the obvious question: yes, you'll be able to redistribute them as part of Squeak.
10 fonts; basically, serif, sans, and mono, in 3 faces; with Xft and fontconfig we oblique the missing one of each. I think the serif font has all four of the usual faces (normal, bold, oblique (italic), bold oblique (italic).
I hope preliminary versions will be available next week, (no redistribution) and final versions available in a month (free redistribtion).
Here's what I recently posted to Slashdot to clarify things.
Ok, folks, here a bit more information for you.
1) We hope a preliminary version of the fonts will be available next week for download, but no redistribution. They still need some work; consider this a beta test.
2) We hope finished fonts will be available in a month or so, after Jim Lyles (the font designer) has finished them up. We need a few changes: the font family Vera is derived from (Prima) has "0" and "O" too hard to distinguish, and similarly for "1" and "l", given our often technical audience.
There is also some work on hinting, etc, to finish up.
When finished, they will go under a copyright which allows you (roughly) to fold, spindle, and mutilate the fonts, so long as you change the name to something else, and you can sell them so long as you don't sell them by themselves. You can sell them with any software whatsoever. You can freely redistribute the fonts anywhere, anytime, unmodified under that name.
The sale provision is that Bitstream does not want other font vendors to just drop the fonts into their font sale mechanisms and sell them, something they are giving away.
I can't say I blame them.
3) the coverage of these fonts is roughly western european; there is the possibility of some fonts in the future with wider coverage, but as that those fonts are not yet complete, I don't want to say much more, as their availability is much less certain.
4) You can get a good idea of what the fonts look like and what the coverage is by the following URL (once the slashdot effect allows Bitstream to recover).
http://store.bitstream.com/searchresults.asp?searc htext=Prima
Now you know where the name Vera comes from :-).
5) the agreement also covers potentially adding characters to the family under the Bitstream Vera name, but Bitstream (and Gnome) reserve the right to approve the additions: we want to *know* when we open fonts of these names that we have what we expect. Feel free to hack to your hearts content under other names, however. -- Jim Gettys Cambridge Research Laboratory HP Labs, Hewlett-Packard Company Jim.Gettys@hp.com
Sender: squeak-dev-bounces@lists.squeakfoundation.org From: "Gavin Scott" gavin@allegro.com Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2003 14:35:35 -0800 To: squeak-dev@lists.squeakfoundation.org Subject: Mmmmmm, free fonts...
Slashdot is reporting that the Gnome people have talked Bitstream into licensing a total of ten high-quality fonts for use in free software. I haven't gone to see what the actual license looks like, but I thought it might be worth mentioning here. The press release is at:
http://www.gnome.org/pr-bitstreamfonts.html
G.
squeak-dev@lists.squeakfoundation.org