I try to make the Squeak as I dream as soon as possible.
Take a fresh Squeak4.3-11157.image
Do Smalltalk unloadAllKnown
Do Update Squeak
Now About Squeak says
Squeak 4.2 Latest update: 9063
Any clues ?
Edgar
The version number is very simplistic: it sums the version number of each package. If you remove some packages, the version number decreases....
You would have to increase a constant to compensate for removed packages.
Nicolas
2011/3/26 Edgar J. De Cleene edgardec2005@gmail.com:
I try to make the Squeak as I dream as soon as possible.
Take a fresh Squeak4.3-11157.image
Do Smalltalk unloadAllKnown
Do Update Squeak
Now About Squeak says
Squeak 4.2 Latest update: 9063
Any clues ?
Edgar
On 3/26/11 1:12 PM, "Nicolas Cellier" nicolas.cellier.aka.nice@gmail.com wrote:
The version number is very simplistic: it sums the version number of each package. If you remove some packages, the version number decreases....
You would have to increase a constant to compensate for removed packages.
Nicolas
In my own fork I could retrieve .cs or .mcz from my repository or from trunk.
And loading .mcz rises the update number. Also originate a numbered .cs
No operation should originate a image with a update number less as original one IMHO
As I do Smalltalk unloadAllKnownPackages, then
SystemVersion newVersion: 'SqueakCore4.3' SystemVersion current resetHighestUpdate. SystemVersion current highestUpdate: 11157
And originate new sources with this.
Edgar
squeak-dev@lists.squeakfoundation.org