In other email i saw thath you speaks about the 3.10 release and 4.
Then, how stable is actually 3.9?
On 13.03.2006, at 17:53, Lord ZealoN wrote:
In other email i saw thath you speaks about the 3.10 release and 4.
Then, how stable is actually 3.9?
I think it's already quite usable... there are not many new bugs reported on Mantis. I use it for my daily work.
We hope to be able to go beta soon.
On the todo list, we have as big items:
-> Sync with SqueakLand -> Sync with SmallLand -> Some Traits related fixes -> Go over mantis once again to see if we missed anything -> Fix SqueakMap -> Sync with Networking Team for bugfixes.
Marcus
On Mon, 13 Mar 2006 18:04:28 +0100, Marcus Denker denker@iam.unibe.ch wrote:
On 13.03.2006, at 17:53, Lord ZealoN wrote:
Then, how stable is actually 3.9?
I think it's already quite usable...
Yup. I think that 3.9beta might be a good point to start forming the 3.10 team, so they can create a todo list, etcetera, and 3.9gamma would then be the moment where the 3.10 team could kick off with the first alpha.
And yes, I know that I need to kick the I/O team into action. I'm almost done moving, after that it is my highest priority on my list.
squeak-dev@lists.squeakfoundation.org
-
Cees de Groot -
Lord ZealoN -
Marcus Denker