I just tried closing down the BFAV thread mentioned below, and I got the following mail in response.
I've only seen these since I added the X-Squeak-Version header change, and while I don't see why that should change anything, I wonder why I got this message.
What does it mean "Message has implicit destination"? My exim logs say
2004-08-20 12:35:50 no host name found for IP address 80.168.137.82 2004-08-20 12:35:51 1By7gV-0008dW-Gd <= frank.shearar@rnid.org.uk H=(wsfrank) [80.168.137.82] P=smtp S=632 2004-08-20 12:35:52 1By7gV-0008dW-Gd => frank.shearar@rnid.org.uk Frank.Shearar@rnid.org.uk R=dnslookup T=remote_smtp H=mail2.rnid.org.uk [217.158.120.228] 2004-08-20 12:35:52 1By7gV-0008dW-Gd => karl.ramberg@chello.se R=dnslookup T=remote_smtp H=mail.chello.se [213.46.243.2] 2004-08-20 12:35:53 1By7gV-0008dW-Gd => squeak-harvest@lists.squeakfoundation.org R=dnslookup T=remote_smtp H=mail.theinternetone.net [62.4.94.210] X=TLSv1:DES-CBC3-SHA:168
which to me seems like the To header's there...
I googled a bit, and Mailman seems to send this message when you've BCCd the list. Although http://mail.python.org/pipermail/mailman-users/2003-January/025511.html says that "It could be that more than one domain or host name resolves to your particular host".
So what gives? Is it BFAV's fault or the list's? :)
frank
-----Original Message----- From: squeak-harvest-bounces@lists.squeakfoundation.org [mailto:squeak-harvest-bounces@lists.squeakfoundation.org] Sent: 20 August 2004 12:36 To: Frank Shearar Subject: Your message to Squeak-harvest awaits moderator approval
Your mail to 'Squeak-harvest' with the subject
[BUG][FIX] DRNPFix ( [closed] Committed to BFAV v170 )Is being held until the list moderator can review it for approval.
The reason it is being held:
Message has implicit destinationEither the message will get posted to the list, or you will receive notification of the moderator's decision. If you would like to cancel this posting, please visit the following URL:
http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/confirm/squeak-harvest/c72af e4fad9081e4667590fb6dedf5df7d6995a2
******************************************************************* This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent RNID policy. If you are not the intended recipient you are advised that any use, dissemination, forwarding, printing or copying of this email is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error please notify the RNID Helpdesk by telephone on: +44 (0) 207 296 8282. The Royal National Institute for Deaf People Registered Office 19*23 Featherstone Street London EC1Y 8SL No. 454169 (England) Registered Charity No. 207720 ********************************************************************
On Friday 20 August 2004 5:37 am, Frank Shearar wrote:
I just tried closing down the BFAV thread mentioned below, and I got the following mail in response.
I've only seen these since I added the X-Squeak-Version header change, and while I don't see why that should change anything, I wonder why I got this message.
What does it mean "Message has implicit destination"? My exim logs say
2004-08-20 12:35:50 no host name found for IP address 80.168.137.82 2004-08-20 12:35:51 1By7gV-0008dW-Gd <= frank.shearar@rnid.org.uk H=(wsfrank) [80.168.137.82] P=smtp S=632 2004-08-20 12:35:52 1By7gV-0008dW-Gd => frank.shearar@rnid.org.uk Frank.Shearar@rnid.org.uk R=dnslookup T=remote_smtp H=mail2.rnid.org.uk [217.158.120.228] 2004-08-20 12:35:52 1By7gV-0008dW-Gd => karl.ramberg@chello.se R=dnslookup T=remote_smtp H=mail.chello.se [213.46.243.2] 2004-08-20 12:35:53 1By7gV-0008dW-Gd => squeak-harvest@lists.squeakfoundation.org R=dnslookup T=remote_smtp H=mail.theinternetone.net [62.4.94.210] X=TLSv1:DES-CBC3-SHA:168
which to me seems like the To header's there...
I googled a bit, and Mailman seems to send this message when you've BCCd the list. Although http://mail.python.org/pipermail/mailman-users/2003-January/025511.html says that "It could be that more than one domain or host name resolves to your particular host".
So what gives? Is it BFAV's fault or the list's? :)
Probably need to see the mail headers. Who's the moderator of that list?
On Fri, 2004-08-20 at 09:47, Ned Konz wrote:
On Friday 20 August 2004 5:37 am, Frank Shearar wrote:
<snip>
So what gives? Is it BFAV's fault or the list's? :)
Probably need to see the mail headers. Who's the moderator of that list?
Me.
This problem has happened once before last week and I sent Frank an email asking about it and he never responded. Did you not get my email Frank?
Anyway, it's a little hard to be certain but here's part of what I get:
Return-Path: frank.shearar@rnid.org.uk Delivered-To: mailman-squeak-harvest@lists.squeakfoundation.org Received: (qmail 18906 invoked from network); 20 Aug 2004 11:35:53 -0000 Received: from 81-86-64-25.dsl.pipex.com (HELO roke.angband.za.org) (81.86.64.25) by mail.theinternetone.net with DES-CBC3-SHA encrypted SMTP; 20 Aug 2004 11:35:53 -0000 Received: from [80.168.137.82] (helo=wsfrank) by roke.angband.za.org with smtp (Exim 4.41 (FreeBSD)) id 1By7gV-0008dW-Gd; Fri, 20 Aug 2004 12:35:51 +0100 Subject: [BUG][FIX] DRNPFix ( [closed] Committed to BFAV v170 ) X-squeak-bugfix-archive: Yes In-reply-to: 20040818092854.JBRQ2608.amsfep12-int.chello.nl@c213-89-92-101.cm-upc.chello.se From: Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2004 10:28:00 -0500 Message-Id: 1093015680.1181.5.camel@12-222-173-196.client.insightbb.com Mime-Version: 1.0
From: frank.shearar@rnid.org.uk References: 20040818092854.JBRQ2608.amsfep12-int.chello.nl@c213-89-92-101.cm-upc.chello.se
To: Frank.Shearar@rnid.org.uk To: karl.ramberg@chello.se To: squeak-harvest@lists.squeakfoundation.org X-squeak-version: Squeak3.8alpha; latest update: #5976
If there's really a blank line in there that's a definite no-no. However maybe that's just something mailman is doing to bring attention. Anyway another no-no is the multiple To: headers I believe. Hasn't this come up before? If we aren't certain I'd be glad to find the official word in this in the appropriate STD RFC.
AThe reason that mailman gives me for rejection of this message is 'Message has implicit destination'. It's something of a guess, but I suspect that mailman is searching for the list email address and not finding it because it is stopping at the first To: header which should be the only one.
Ken
squeak-dev@lists.squeakfoundation.org
-
Frank Shearar -
karl.ramberg＠chello.se -
Ken Causey -
Ned Konz