I think Chris meant to send this to the list...

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: RE: Bug Tracking (Re: Squeak 2.8 "finalization")
Date: Sat, 18 Nov 2000 15:56:55 -0500
From: "Norton, Chris" <chrisn at Kronos.com>
To: 'Doug Way ' <dway at riskmetrics.com>

Thanks for the re-post Doug.

Sorry folks for sending out a document in Word format.  I wasn't thinking
very clearly, I guess.  I happen to like Word and that's my processor of
choice.  I s'pose I could have saved it in some other format, but I was very
tired when I posted that doc.

Cheers,

---==> Chris

PS>  I agree that the doc I posted has lots of stuff we don't need, but then
again, it's good to have more and trim it down, then less.

PPS>  I'm away from my nice work machine this week, so my replies will be
limited to once or twice a day.  I hope you Americans have a nice
Thanksgiving holiday (and the rest of you too!). 



-----Original Message-----
From: Doug Way
To: squeak at cs.uiuc.edu
Sent: 11/18/00 3:27 PM
Subject: Re: Bug Tracking (Re: Squeak 2.8 "finalization")


Okay, here it is as HTML, since I happened to have MS Word handy to
translate it.  It does have some formatting, so plain text might not
have worked too well.  Folks without browsers can still view it in
Scamper.

There's some useful stuff in there, although overall I don't think we
would want this many features to start out with.  The trick is narrowing
down what we do want.

Regarding Bijan's original post, I would be willing to help out as part
of a larger bug-tracking/fix-integrating group.  The current informal
system is too much work for a single person.

- Doug Way
  dway at riskmetrics.com