Question about Monticello in 3.9a-6686
Juan Vuletich
jmvsqueak at uolsinectis.com.ar
Tue Sep 6 11:40:53 UTC 2005
Thanks Avi!
----- Original Message -----
From: "Avi Bryant" <avi.bryant at gmail.com>
To: "The general-purpose Squeak developers list"
<squeak-dev at lists.squeakfoundation.org>
Sent: Monday, September 05, 2005 10:58 PM
Subject: Re: Question about Monticello in 3.9a-6686
>
> On Sep 5, 2005, at 6:51 PM, jmvsqueak wrote:
>> In the "old" 3.9, I loaded Monticello from SqueakMap and the package
>> list had a tree structure that showed the prerequisites of each package.
>> In a fresh 3.9a-6686, the package list in Monticello doesn't offer a way
>> to see the required packages for a package. Is this a bug? I'm I missing
>> something?
> This is because 3.9a includes ToolBuilder (which provides an abstraction
> over Morphic, MVC, Tweak, etc), and so Monticello is using that rather
> than the Morphic-specific UI you're used to. However, Monticello's
> ToolBuilder support is incomplete, and widgets that should be trees
> display as lists. So the end result is that Monticello in 3.9a has a
> somewhat crippled UI compared to previous versions.
>
> You can get it to use the old Morphic UI by commenting out the second
> line of MCTool>>show, like so:
>
> show
> modal _ false.
> "Smalltalk at: #ToolBuilder ifPresent: [:tb | tb open: self. ^
> self]."
> ^self window openInWorldExtent: self defaultExtent; yourself
>
> HTH,
> Avi
>
>
>
> --
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
> Version: 7.0.344 / Virus Database: 267.10.18/89 - Release Date: 9/2/2005
>
>
More information about the Squeak-dev
mailing list
|