Question about Monticello in 3.9a-6686

Juan Vuletich jmvsqueak at uolsinectis.com.ar
Tue Sep 6 11:40:53 UTC 2005


Thanks Avi!
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Avi Bryant" <avi.bryant at gmail.com>
To: "The general-purpose Squeak developers list" 
<squeak-dev at lists.squeakfoundation.org>
Sent: Monday, September 05, 2005 10:58 PM
Subject: Re: Question about Monticello in 3.9a-6686


>
> On Sep 5, 2005, at 6:51 PM, jmvsqueak wrote:
>> In the "old" 3.9, I loaded Monticello from SqueakMap and the  package 
>> list had a tree structure that showed the prerequisites of  each package. 
>> In a fresh 3.9a-6686, the package list in Monticello  doesn't offer a way 
>> to see the required packages for a package. Is  this a bug? I'm I missing 
>> something?
> This is because 3.9a includes ToolBuilder (which provides an  abstraction 
> over Morphic, MVC, Tweak, etc), and so Monticello is  using that rather 
> than the Morphic-specific UI you're used to.    However, Monticello's 
> ToolBuilder support is incomplete, and widgets  that should be trees 
> display as lists.  So the end result is that  Monticello in 3.9a has a 
> somewhat crippled UI compared to previous  versions.
>
> You can get it to use the old Morphic UI by commenting out the second 
> line of MCTool>>show, like so:
>
> show
>     modal _ false.
>     "Smalltalk at: #ToolBuilder ifPresent: [:tb | tb open: self. ^ 
> self]."
>     ^self window openInWorldExtent: self defaultExtent; yourself
>
> HTH,
> Avi
>
>
>
> -- 
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
> Version: 7.0.344 / Virus Database: 267.10.18/89 - Release Date: 9/2/2005
>
> 




More information about the Squeak-dev mailing list