[SqNOS] Out-of-date links and small rewrite

[Karl Ramberg]

I'll forward to Ken which I think is the person who know this issue...

Karl


On 2009-04-08 18:11, Gerardo Richarte wrote:
> Derek Peschel wrote:
>    
>> Some minor housekeeping would make the SqueakNOS pages much more friendly
>> for the casual browser.
>>
>> 1. This URL:  http://people.squeakfoundation.org/proj/SqueakNOS/
>>     is now bad.
>> 2. This URL:  http://people.squeakfoundation.org/person/gera/
>>     is also bad.
>>      
> Noooo, this is really really bad! I was not paying attention when
> squeakfoudnation.org died... I'm very sad about it, I had put some
> effort in maintaining the site, and writing articles and daily entries
> that are now lost?
> The only thing I could find, so far, is
>
> http://web.archive.org/web/20080213064454/http://people.squeakfoundation.org/proj/SqueakNOS/
> and
> http://web.archive.org/web/20071215172246/http://people.squeakfoundation.org/person/gera/
>
> but I think that's not updated to the last changes.
>    
>> Gera, any ideas?  The Wiki points to this too.
>>
>>      
> No, no ideas except trying to recover what we've lost and putting it
> somewhere else, does anybody know if the content was moved somewhere
> else? I have just asked in the squeak list, lets see what they say.
>    
>> 3. On these pages: http://www.squeaksource.com/@GNJajakL4a4kH8PK/Hdr9024c
>>     http://www.squeaksource.com/SqueakNOS/
>>
>>      
> I'm on it. Ok, changed now. Will update when we have better news.
>    
>> 4. On SqueakNOS's Wiki page, is the sentence "We've put up a mailing list
>>     to talk SqueakNOS, join in, or just drop an email there." really two
>>     sentences run together, or something else I misunderstood?  The second
>>     sentence "Join in, or just drop an email there." is not true since you
>>     _can't_ post without subscribing.  I'm happy to slightly rewrite the text
>>     unless someone has other ideas or objections.
>>      
>
> Well... I think that if somebody sends an email to the list I'll get it
> even if the sender is not subscribed to the list. In the cases when it's
> not spam, I resend it or let it through. Of course, with so much spam
> it's not trivial to moderate, but I do my best... have you sent anything
> without being subscribed that I have not seen?
>
>      gera
> _______________________________________________
> SqueakNOS mailing list
> SqueakNOS at lists.squeakfoundation.org
> http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/squeaknos
>
>    

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/squeaknos/attachments/20090408/9fed6ad8/attachment.htm