[UI] Re: UI plan, my thoughts

Juan Vuletich juan at jvuletich.org
Sun Aug 26 17:54:46 UTC 2007


As I said in this thread, my work there was splitting the big Morphic 
package into Morphic, Morphic Extras and Etoys. I also harvested some 
fixes from Jerome Peace.

I don't think there's someone who considers himself the maintainer of 
Morphic.

I published my reduced Morphic image where I started Morphic 3.0. The 
Morphic 3.0 image is also available.

Cheers,
Juan Vuletich
www.jvuletich.org

Igor Stasenko wrote:
> On 26/08/07, Juan Vuletich <juan at jvuletich.org> wrote:
>   
>> Hi Bert,
>>
>> Bert Freudenberg wrote:
>>     
>>> On Aug 25, 2007, at 19:27 , Juan Vuletich wrote:
>>>
>>>       
>>>>  I found little support for that from the Board
>>>>         
>>> You make that sound like the Board opposed any of this. This is not
>>> the case, the Board so far has stayed out of *any* technical advise,
>>> it is leaving these to the teams.
>>>       
>> That's true.
>>     
>>> If anything, there was (unfortunately) little support from the Morphic
>>> Team.
>>>       
>> That's not so true. I was the team leader, so support from the Morphic
>> Team basically meant support for myself. But what I wanted to do would
>> have broken badly back compatibility, and would have caused serious
>> trouble to Etoys users. It was a risky decision, with good and bad
>> consequences for many people. Too much for the Morphic Team (i.e. for
>> myself) to make. That's why I asked the community and the Board for
>> support. Basically, the Board didn't take a position, and the community
>> (almost all who said something) were against it.
>>
>>     
>
> What was fruits which came from morphic team before you stopped developing?
> And what is the current state of morphic package, does it have any maintainers?
> I have to admit that morphic in its current state requires a clean up.
> Maybe starting from a scratch is a good decision.
> Lately in squeak-dev there was note of someone who doing clean-up ,
> called minimal morphic. He's task was to remove dependencies from
> Etoys in basic Morphs package code.
>
> Maybe first, before new team can start doing something new, its better
> to make an overview to think about what is done, what is started but
> not finished and what is need to be done?
>
>   
>> I understand this, and it's ok. It is just that after that, I started
>> doing all this in my own fork, the Morphic 3.0 image.
>>
>>     
>
>
>   
>> Cheers,
>> Juan Vuletich
>> www.jvuletich.org
>>     
>>> - Bert -
>>>
>>>       
>> _______________________________________________
>> UI mailing list
>> UI at lists.squeakfoundation.org
>> http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ui
>>
>>     
>
>
>   



More information about the UI mailing list