On Sat, 26 May 2007 14:12:59 +0200, Damien Cassou wrote:
2007/5/26, Lukas Renggli renggli@gmail.com:
Thank you for this comments. That was what I was afraid of. Is it possible to have test that will show #nextPutAll: is not protected?
Maybe with the code simulation you can enforce that there are task-switches inbetween.
What is that?
Let the three forks wait on their own semaphore in a circular manner (but would this show anything except that three processes do indeed wait for their own semaphore in a circular manner).
Wasn't something similiar posted here recently, together with aha's (cannot find it, dammned buzzword-based search engines ;-)
/Klaus