On 28-11-2014, at 6:05 PM, Levente Uzonyi leves@elte.hu wrote:
I think the conclusion was that it's better to leave the method as it is, because there's no better way to do it.
There’s *always* a better way to do it. Somebody just has to think about it the right way.
tim -- tim Rowledge; tim@rowledge.org; http://www.rowledge.org/tim It is easier to change the specification to fit the program than vice versa.