Many thanks for everyone's comments.
Generally, I'm pretty fed up with Communicator. It's adequate, I suppose, but slow, forever popping up modal dialogue boxes and has none of the virtues or vices of outlook. I wish I'd gone with something sensible like pine or Kmail.....
But, since my little Rolodex thing uses Celeste, and since it's obviously undergoing a good deal of development, a switch to Celeste seems to make some kind of sense (at least in theory!) and I think, somewhere in the back of my mind was the idea that it might acquire a sort of database (or database like) functionality: you know the kind of thing, somewhere, deep in my MySQL digest is the URL to a reference someone on the HH list desperately needs. I could (and have!) easily spent half an hour looking for it.
On to specifics:
danielv@netvision.net.il wrote:
What might be too slow for your comfort is the operation of saving and loading the index, which is dependent on how many messages you have. However, this is only done when you open/close Celeste, so that's not too bad. Another thing is that the in memory index, well, takes up memory...
I'll buy some more! It's actually pretty slow in Netscape, too.
About the conversion - Nope, we don't have a Communicator format mail reader/importer. However, it's pretty easy to write them - that's how I converted from MH, for example - I wrote the class MHMainInboxFile (all two methods of it). Your milage might vary - but a Communicator filter would probably be useful to other people too.
I'll take a look and see if I can make sense out of it. With my coding skills, I may be gone for some time.....
Anther question - Do you have a deep mail category tree? Celeste has a flat list. You'll have to think what you want to do with that.
It's only two levels deep: inbox and then a flat layer of other categories.
Mike and Bijan's postings have encouraged me to hold on for a moment, but just let me know when you think the time is right, folks!
Thanks again
Cheers
John