7 Dec
2002
7 Dec
'02
12:43 a.m.
On Thu, 5 Dec 2002, Torge.Husfeldt wrote:
No, You got it both wrong ;) Should've looked at the long story. SubSEquenceableCollection really is a good name _because_ it denotes slices (sliceability). It is really used to factor the slicing out of SequencebleCollection. In this light it becomes clear that you will never need a subsubsub...SQ.
Rgards, Torge
I mentioned "SubSequence" because Slate implements those and renames SequenceableCollection to Sequence. What I was suggesting was that SequenceableCollection includes (sub-)sliceability or linearization capability, and that SubSequence be the slices themselves.
--
Brian T. Rice
LOGOS Research and Development
mailto:water@tunes.org
http://tunes.org/~water/