14 Dec
2012
14 Dec
'12
10:24 a.m.
Colin Putney-3 wrote
I wrote a couple of paragraphs on why it wouldn't make sense to have an implementation FileDirectory as a layer on top of Filesystem, but then I came to the conclusion that it might not be a bad idea after all. The devil is in the details, and we ought to look into the details. Either way, the current implementation of FileDirectory should eventually be available as a loadable package, so that we can still build images with legacy code that depends on it.
+1. Sounds much better than trying to build a compatible version.
Cheers, - Andreas
-- View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/FileSystem-was-About-backwards-Compatibility-tp4659123... Sent from the Squeak - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.