I'm surprised too.
I can see the point - long-running tests, well, take too long. Could we have some kind've warning though? "35 long-running tests not run."
frank
On 2010/09/22 16:25, Casey Ransberger wrote:
Wait, what? The second time you run, you get less tests?
That's completely counter intuitive. Tests should never affect future runs... seems like someone left off a tearDown method somewhere.
On Sep 22, 2010, at 6:53 AM, Levente Uzonyileves@elte.hu wrote:
On Wed, 22 Sep 2010, Frank Shearar wrote:
On 2010/09/22 10:53, Frank Shearar wrote:
On 2010/09/22 09:31, Frank Shearar wrote:
On 2010/09/22 05:31, Casey Ransberger wrote:
Grab it here: http://ftp.squeak.org/trunk/Squeak4.2-10548-alpha.zip
OK, new experiment:
- Start up the image,
- Run all tests,
- Run all tests _again_.
The failing Decompiler tests now all pass.
No they don't. They just don't run, because those are LongTestCases and there's a test, which turns off the preference that enables the running of LongTestCases. So after the first run, the preference is off, therefore LongTestCases won't be run the second time.
Levente
frank