Am 02.08.2004 um 17:11 schrieb lex@cc.gatech.edu:
No, I mainly mean that there should be people who can say "yes" to the really obvious bugfixes without needing two approvals and an SUnit test.
This is actualy not how the current process works in practice. I sent you the mail that an Sunit test would be needed because I executed your example, nothing happended that I could trivialy see as "broken". So I just was confused and having a test is quite nice in that case. I should have written that, sorry.
For the process: What is needed as of today is just that someone whom I trust says "yes, that's good". Then I sent an approval. For a lot of simple fixes I do both: I look at the code, file it in, test, and then I approve. This is especialy the case with non-complicated stuff from trusted people (e.g. Ned).
So there is no real complicated process with required SUnit tests, formal peer review or stuff like that. (if you look at the stuff that is already approved you can see that).
I will answer your mails in more detail later.
Marcus