On Thursday 17 July 2003 06:01 pm, Andrew C. Greenberg wrote:
I am once again concerned about the use of LGPL for squeak code, in view of the positions recently taken by FSF with respect to LGPL and Java-based libraries, which has taken the view that clients of "included" Java libraries are virally attached by LGPL.
Hi Andrew,
Just a quick glance at SqueakMap shows me that few packages seem to be under LGPL.
I hadn't realized that StarBrowser was listed as LGPL (or if I did I forgot). I've written Roel to see if he would be willing to change it to something else (MIT?).
Do you think that even having LGPL packages pointed at by SqueakMap is a problem, or is it just their use you're concerned about?
Thanks,