Yes, indeed.
And in particular I suggest to go for a fluid layout, so that it looks fine on smaller screens
http://twitter.github.com/bootstrap/examples/fluid.html
With Firefox 15.0 for example you have a new menu option Web developer / Responsive web design where you can easily choose different screen sizes and have a look how the site renders for various screen sizes.
This does not use much time in terms of Smalltalk as it is all CSS. It will give us a modern web site.
In any case, Chris, thank you very much for going for an Altitude web site. It is good to have a test site. We were well served by Aida in the past but giving the new framework a chance is fine as well.
---Hannes
On 11/20/12, Chris Cunnington smalltalktelevision@gmail.com wrote:
On 2012-11-20 9:59 AM, radoslav hodnicak wrote:
On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 2:12 PM, Chris Cunnington <smalltalktelevision@gmail.com mailto:smalltalktelevision@gmail.com> wrote:
- Chris C. has developed a prototype of a new squeak.org <http://squeak.org> homepage. It's latest version can be found at [7]. It is an Altitude website. There are questions about the site on two fronts: how it looks; and, how stable it is. There has been doubt about how the site should look. Opinions about its design, logo, layout, CSS, etc. are welcome. Herbert Konig is helping to harden it with the Selenium testing suite. [8] [9] The most recent image has been up for +200 hours without a problem. Colin has added changes to Altitude, which will be deployed soon.
I would suggest using Twitter's Bootstrap framework, it's easy to adopt and the defaults look reasonably pleasant even when a programmer puts the site together.
Cheers, Rado
http://twitter.github.com/bootstrap/
A good tip. Thanks.
Chris