On Jul 4, 2005, at 7:18 AM, Avi Bryant wrote:
Yes, I agree. The apache.org site is a good example here: there's almost nothing on the top-level site, and everyone always links to one of the (many) project sites. One thing that makes this feel a little more cohesive is that they are all something.apache.org. I don't know if that's a can of worms we want to open, but in theory I can see having a very simple, general www.squeak.org with tweak.squeak.org, wx.squeak.org, and so on below it serving individual communities.
And then on the main squeak.org site, we do aggregation as new articles of the distributed sites. And don't forget SqueakLand and Croquet pointers as well. Kind of a SqueakDot site as the root. Lots of activity, but all of it distributed, because in truth, that's how we all operate anyway.
My 2 cents,
Brian