"Cees De Groot" cdegroot@gmail.com wrote:
For example, while Squeak Central has always stated that they were careful to separate proprietary code from public code during their stint at Disney, it was never stated that Disney was not the owner of the public code. So we have to assume they are, which means that for any of the work done by any SqC member during that time we'd need a license grant under the APSL from Disney, not the person who has his/her initials on the code.
Which brings us back to my post which (oddly I thought) went more or less totally uncommented:
http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/squeak-dev/2006-June/105229 .html
Was it too long to read? :)
regards, Göran