David,
It seems you have some experience with GOODS. Can you shed some information regarding your experience with it, primarily in terms of performance. All the tests I've run so far indicate to me that performance of GOODS leaves a lot to be desired. However, because of architectural reasons, I find GOODS to be a valuable OODB.
Thanks, Daniel
On Apr 12, 2005, at 6:43 PM, David Shaffer wrote:
As soon as performance laggs ;-) Personally I use BTree's and TreeSet's w/ GOODS in many places. Generally any collection that grows over a couple hundred elements. They have a huge impact on things like "user lists" which are searched quite often. Using a Dictionary for persistence hasn't worked well for me in these cases.
David