Tim Rowledge wrote:
To get started I should get a working squeak system...
That would certainly help.
Yeah, I went and downloaded all 8M of the win 95 version hoping that I could compile it with B TC++ 4.5 under Win 3.11... No deal. =\
Ain't no such thing. There is plently of doc around, most of it referenced from the squeak.org site and/or the swiki. Much of it only exists in virtual form. There are two books on Squeak (search amazon.com or you favourite booksite for 'Squeak and guzdial') and several on Smalltalk. Even ignoring the completely implausible request for no redundancy, there simply isn't any such thing as 'complete'. We keep changing things!
Are you aware of a process called "configuration managment"? For Squeak to be a viable commercial alternative (never mind the performance issue), it must be clearly documented and well controlled.
Otherwise companies cannot rely on it enough to use it...