On Wed, 1 May 2002, Henrik Gedenryd wrote: [snip]
I think Stephane has an important point here. Especially Anthony should work closely with SqC, in particular Dan, to make sure that the BC code is ok and clear for integration into V4.
Is there really any reason to think that this isn't happening? Tim seems to be on the ball with V4.
Changing the image format is a *huge* change, after all.
[snip]
Now if only the dozens of people who promised to help with the modules would actually make good on their promises, then things would look really good.
IIRC, I only promises to kvetch and complain no matter *what* design was put forth. I admit that I've failed on this front but I'm sure that's not a problem :)
SqueakEnd is nigh. Dan will be giving a talk about modules. There are some projects for modularizing chunks. Hacking will happen. A prep list of Tasks To Do would likely stimulate some work.
One question I have is about what happens if you do the little "replace the pool&category part of the class definition with module ref" on a change set...do the things filed in end up inside the mentioned modules?
Is it worth setting up a more sophsticated mapping from old categories to new modules so we can more painlessly file in old stuff? Any hints on how to do this? :)
Cheers, Bijan Parsia.