stéphane ducasse a écrit :
Tim you are pointing a very important point. After the announce of the change to APSL2.0 of Squeak1.1, we have to ask ourself which part of {Squeak3.8}{Squeak1.1} can be relicensed and probably much more important which part cannot be relicensed.
I very much doubt that there are any parts that cannot be relicensed, if in fact it is even really neccesary. What would be wrong with taking the position that the original squeak license (which is quite adequately free in my opinion) has been rescinded and replaced by the APSL? I think that would be compatible with the SqL clause about relicensing so long as it is no less protective of Apple, since after all they have chosen this new license. Surely *any* code released under SqL can be declared as relicensed?
you see tim this what I would like to know from the laywer we contacted ( do not remember his name).
Did you get any feedback from the laywer? How can we make progress regarding this proposal?
Hilaire