karl.ramberg@chello.se wrote:
I think we could/should agree on that a rollback of a cs in the unstable stream should be the very last option to get out of a jam eg. a update that screw up seriously. People comitting to be part of unstable should be credited for their comitment and we should not pull the carpet under their feet at every twist and turn. We need people working for enhancing
But, please, lets not forget we are talking about an *unstable alpha* stream here. alpha in my understanding already implies "all bets are off, don't rely on it for serious work", and the word "unstable" has a certain meaning as well. We should, however, keep unstable and stable closer together. The gap we got in the 3.8 process was a result from too many things trying to get in at once while we were still sorting out the m17n issues.
JMTC
Michael