Andreas Raab ha scritto:
John M McIntosh wrote:
Really I suspect the VM version numbers should fully decouple from the image version numbers, really nothing requires one to use a 3.10 image to build a VM that will work with a 3.10, I'm quite happy to continue working with my 3.8 VMMaker image...
And of course the story comes full circle once people realize that the reason for naming the VMs according to image versions was precisely in response to complaints about how confusing it is that the versions differ ;-)
Heh. We could keep the current version as an "internal" version, and add an "external" version that will stay in sync with the image version.
What do you think?
Giovanni