On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 9:59 AM, Edgar J. De Cleene edgardec2001@yahoo.com.ar wrote:
On 2/28/10 11:01 PM, "David T. Lewis" lewis@mail.msen.com wrote:
On Sun, Feb 28, 2010 at 06:47:58PM +0100, Karl Ramberg wrote:
Hi, I have worked on packaging the Etoys image and saved them to source.squeak.org/etoys. I'm new to Monticello and hope I did not screw up too badly.
Folks,
Efforts are under way to synchronize Etoys with Squeak trunk. The Etoys developers have taken some first steps to save the Etoys image in Monticello archives (http://source.squeak.org/etoys).
Since Monticello is being used to support this work, and since package naming conventions are important in Monticello, it will be helpful to all involved if the package names in trunk conform to the correct spelling of Etoys: http://lists.squeakland.org/pipermail/etoys-dev/2010-February/004397.html
For this reason, I am about to post an update to Squeak trunk that changes all package names to from "EToys" to "Etoys" and changes all package overrides from "*eToys", "*EToys" and so forth to "*Etoys".
As far as I know, this update requires no special changes to the trunk update stream. However, I've been wrong about this sort of thing before so if any problems appear in the update process, you can reasonably assume that it is my fault. Also, apologies in advance for the rather large update notification that may result from this change.
Dave
IMHO the right thing to do is:
In the trunk image we do Smalltalk unloadAllKnownPackages.
From the Etoys repositories we load Etoys, so we have the right and the
last.
And we also have differences in Project and maybe some other classes , which should be solved if we wish trunk .image load Etoys 4 project.
Edgar
Hi. This is a start to get to be able to merge with trunk.
There is much more than the Etoys package in the images that must be worked out before we can merge.
But hopefully trough some effort we can bring the two together. Etoys image is 3.8 based so there are quite a few changes to account for...
Karl