Thanks Yanni for your feedback.
I agree with what you have said and I think it would be very nice to have a good solid UML stencil. So now that I have a little more of spare time I will use it to improve Jacarandá, first I am gonna try to improve the DiagramBrowser which is what most users are using, and maybe next I will take a shot to an UML stencil.
Thanks,
Regards, Hernán
----- Original Message ----- From: "Yanni Chiu" yanni@rogers.com To: "The general-purpose Squeak developers list" squeak-dev@lists.squeakfoundation.org Sent: Thursday, July 22, 2004 3:29 PM Subject: Re: [BUG][JACARANDA] Jacaranda does not like Connectors 2
Hernan Tylim wrote:
I am curious. Please tell me. Are anyone using the shapes that come
with
Jacaranda? They were developed for a OOP course here in Argentina and because of them I am maintaining them. I allways thought that because
they
were not like the ones in UML they would probably not be used.
I only need class and state diagrams, so the shapes provided have suited me just fine. I noticed that various shapes were not quite conforming. It's not a problem now, but I can imagine that such non-conformance could mean rejection of Jacaranda, for certain users.
One thing I miss is the lack of role labels on each side of a class relationship. I compensated by parsing the relationship name.
Labels, in general, seem to misbehave. But I think Connectors2 (which I've not tried yet) has done some work on labels.
Thanks for a great tool.
--yanni