From: Göran Krampe goran@krampe.se Reply-To: goran@krampe.se, The general-purpose Squeak developers listsqueak-dev@lists.squeakfoundation.org To: "The general-purpose Squeak developers list"squeak-dev@lists.squeakfoundation.org Subject: Re: Squeak and Namespaces Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2006 13:16:14 +0100 (CET)
Hi!
I agree that simplicity/unification is good in principle. One problem would be that it would "force" us to have more namespaces than we actually need. For example, I think base Squeak should just be one namespace - the "Smalltalk one" which has no prefix.
Aha. Ok, I missed this part somehow. So the Kernel::Dictionary scenario doesn't have to happen (as long as we keep it simple), but the issue is still there for other more popular packages. I guess I just see Smalltalk as it is right now as as beautiful as it can get. :)
_________________________________________________________________ Get FREE company branded e-mail accounts and business Web site from Microsoft Office Live http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/mcrssaub0050001411mrt/direct/01/