goran.hultgren@bluefish.se wrote:
This time I wasn't referring to the problem with Debian but to the discussions about SqueakL that has been done on OSI mailinglist for certification. It was said quite clearly (IIRC) that SqueakL is NOT OpenSource.
Just using small letters... Nah. That feels a tad like "pretending". I would write something else.
Frankly, saying that SqueakL isn't "open source" seems ridiculous. Can you recall what the complaint was? Everyone can download all the source to Squeak, modify it, and redistribute modified versions. In fact, it takes some effort to distribute anything written in Squeak (including Squeak itself), *without* including the source code. If that's not open source, then what is?
-Lex