Chris,
You have to agree that a `package comment` belongs with the package and should travel where ever the package goes ...
it's still nice to have a place for a package comment in SqueakMap...
Dale
----- Original Message ----- | From: "Chris Muller" asqueaker@gmail.com | To: "The general-purpose Squeak developers list" squeak-dev@lists.squeakfoundation.org | Sent: Sunday, July 29, 2012 9:29:20 AM | Subject: Re: [squeak-dev] Documentation/Comment per package | | > I'm currently "Nay" on what we have in the Inbox because we don't | > have | > a useful and intuitive way to *consume* the comment. Bert's code | > is | > more for just updating it. People will not go to "scripts + | > comment" | > just to read package comments. Until that is addressed, I think | > the | > enhancement in the Inbox does not add value exceeding its weight. | | Besides that, we already have a place to produce AND consume comments | about packages -- it's called SqueakMap. | |