On 26-Jun-06, at 11:29 AM, Cees De Groot wrote:
On 6/26/06, tim Rowledge tim@rowledge.org wrote:
Further, if Apple have decided that some license is good enough for their purpose to replace the SqL then it seems that they consider this new license 'no less protective'.
Sorry, but I can't go with you there.
[snip] Well, given all that you said (and accepting that it makes some sense), it's hard to imagine how we can do *anything* meaningful. Except a total restart from 1.1/Spoon and get everything imported after (onerous) paperwork from everyone that might plausibly be involved. Even then, what happens for the code from disney/hp/ interval/exobox/ibm/etc that was donated implicitly under SqL?
tim -- tim Rowledge; tim@rowledge.org; http://www.rowledge.org/tim Strange OpCodes: IIB: Ignore Inquiry and Branch anyway