In my opinion Universes should be where you put software. If you want it on Squeakmap as well it doesn't hurt anything, but it doesn't really buy much imo.
The problem with Squeakmap is that it doesn't know dependancies unless you make some script, which causes all kinds of other problems. If there is a concern about having things on Squeakmap then we should make either (a) a single interface that creates a Universe entry and a Squeakmap or (b) a way for Squeakmap to get automatically updated somehow (maybe reading the universes list).
From: Ken Causey ken@kencausey.com Reply-To: The general-purpose Squeak developers listsqueak-dev@lists.squeakfoundation.org To: The general-purpose Squeak developers listsqueak-dev@lists.squeakfoundation.org Subject: Universes/SqueakMap Separation? (was Re: Fun with Symbol) Date: Thu, 24 May 2007 13:42:35 -0500
Sorry, I'm sending this again as I failed to change the subject appropriately.
If this is true, can I say "What is going on?". This is not directed specifically at you Damien; but is this community further splintering?
I'll be the first to admit that I'm nearly oblivious about the Universes concept. But it would disturb me to find that active development is going on that is meant to be public but existing SqueakMap entries are not being updated to reflect it. If this is occurring, why?
Ken
On Thu, 2007-05-24 at 20:12 +0200, Damien Cassou wrote:
2007/5/23, nicolas cellier ncellier@ifrance.com:
Just downloaded AST->88 NewCompiler->117 from SqueakMap
I'm not sure, but I think the version on Universe is much more recent than the one on SqueakMap.
<< signature.asc >>
_________________________________________________________________ PC Magazines 2007 editors choice for best Web mailaward-winning Windows Live Hotmail. http://imagine-windowslive.com/hotmail/?locale=en-us&ocid=TXT_TAGHM_migr...