From: Alan Lovejoy sourcery@pacbell.net Reply-To: squeak@cs.uiuc.edu
<big snip>
- Given the above, I would avoid being dogmatic on this
issue. I think the fact that so many good Smalltalk programmers still access instance variables directly, and that code that commits this "sin" has lasted unchanged for so long, should cause one to at least question whether or not it's all that sinful.
<snip>
Thanks for the brain dump Alan! :-)
I understand the pragmatics of this issue well, but I feel compelled to make a counterpoint about the above. Code that accesses ivars directly can be brittle. In particular, code which uses both direct access and accessor methods on the same ivars can behave in unpredictable ways. Sometimes such code survives for a very long time because it is brittle and hard to understand, and no one wants to touch it for fear of breaking it.
I tend to defer writing code which accesses ivars directly until performance tuning time. I wish I never had to write such code because it hurt the maintainability and extensibility of my design, but I live in the real world (oh Bah!).
Thanks again!
-Carl
_______________________________________________________________ Get Free Email and Do More On The Web. Visit http://www.msn.com