On Fri, Mar 04, 2011 at 11:20:53PM -0600, Miguel Cob? wrote:
Great work, thanks.
A suggestion, why don't follow a common pattern to name the Pharo/Squeak/Gemstone specific code for package XXX with the format:
XXX-Squeak
so that the packages be:
XXX-dtl.123.mcz XXX-Squeak-dtl.123.mcz XXX-Pharo-dtl.123.mcz
This way if a Metacello configuration is created for this package it will pull the corresponding dependency for tha platform where is being installed.
Cheers.
That's a good idea, although at this point I'm not sure which bits are Pharo or Squeak specific. Most of the extensions in the SMx package that I referred to as "Squeak-specific" are from Juan's change sets that he did for the Pharo integration, so hopefully the differences will not be too great.
Thanks, Dave