If etoys and everything will really be loadable at the end, then this sounds very good to me.
From: "Pavel Krivanek" squeak1@continentalbrno.cz Reply-To: The general-purpose Squeak developers listsqueak-dev@lists.squeakfoundation.org To: "The general-purpose Squeak developers list"squeak-dev@lists.squeakfoundation.org Subject: Re: release team discussion (was "2006-11-15 SqF board notes") Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2006 09:04:20 +0100
Hi Craig,
I would like to collaborate on Squeak 3.10 too but I need to know the direction we want to go too. I hope that my vision of the next Squeak development is clear - maximal modularization based on small kernel, minimal morphic system, loadable eToys, test&build server. I would like to know the view of the board on my work and if it is too much radical or we will adopt it as the next official stream.
-- Pavel
On 11/22/06, Craig Latta craig@netjam.org wrote:
Hi Bryce--
Would it be possible to post the list of volunteers to the list with their proposals for the next release? Or better for the volunteers to post their proposals here? It would be great to know [the direction in which people would like to take Squeak]. A little public discussion and visibility would be great.
Squeak-dev has always been an open forum for that (far beyond a
little :). Volunteers should feel free, as always, to discuss what they'd like to do for Squeak.
Keep up the good work.
Thanks!
-C
-- Craig Latta http://netjam.org/resume
_________________________________________________________________ Talk now to your Hotmail contacts with Windows Live Messenger. http://clk.atdmt.com/MSN/go/msnnkwme0020000001msn/direct/01/?href=http://get...