Adrian Lienhard writes:
+1
I wonder, what is the opinion of the Squeakland people?
The arguments for keeping etoys in Squeak seem even weaker to me if the actual stakeholders do not state "yes, this is important for us because we plan to keep our Squeakland fork in sync with future Squeak versions". If this is not the case it does not make sense to have a non maintained version in the main image (and that is what we have now). If there are people willing to remove etoys we should not miss the opportunity!
+1
A cleaner smaller Morphic helps for all non-eToy's uses. Unless eToys is actively maintained in the squeak-dev images then it's better to remove it and point eToys users to the "good" versions.
Letting it rot will create confusion.
Bryce