Have you tried TraitsOmniBrowser (http://www.squeaksource.com/ TraitsOmniBrowser.html)? Also, the OmniBrowser in the image has basic support for Traits. Of course the tools are not perfect. Instead of helping to improve the situation people tend to complain. Unfortunately this will not bring us forward. But hey, its not that important, is it?
Adrian
BTW, Monticello supports Traits too
On Feb 21, 2007, at 11:06 , danil osipchuk wrote:
I would like to use traits (will start making an app with a complex domain model) but the tool support is not sufficient. I think it is not a fair claim that we've got Traits if we have no tools :(
regards, Danil
Göran Krampe wrote:
But... that doesn't mean that I advocate Squeak to stand still language-wise. I love the fact we got Traits - even though it hasn't taken off yet AFAIK - anyone using them btw?
regards, Göran
-- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Squeak- Foundation-Board-2007-Candidates-tf3253392.html#a9078181 Sent from the Squeak - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.