On 10.09.2009, at 20:55, Edgar J. De Cleene wrote:
On 9/10/09 12:32 PM, "Bert Freudenberg" bert@freudenbergs.de wrote:
Not sure what you mean. Yes I see these files in the repository but AFAICT they are not used.
Ok, and thanks to Phillipe also. What I mean is the files can't be loaded because NOT in this repository.
Ah, maybe the files are missing then and only the meta data preserved.
Did you see Andreas' mail? He succeeded to load it into a trunk image. I was just too busy to follow up on that yet.
No, I afraid I miss Andreas mail.
Begin forwarded message:
From: Andreas Raab andreas.raab@gmx.de Date: 6. September 2009 20:53:43 MESZ To: The general-purpose Squeak developers list <squeak-dev@lists.squeakfoundation.org
Cc: Lukas Renggli renggli@iam.unibe.ch Subject: [squeak-dev] Re: source.squeak.org down again Reply-To: The general-purpose Squeak developers list <squeak-dev@lists.squeakfoundation.org
Bert Freudenberg wrote:
I just added you as developer on source.squeak.org.
Thanks. If you take a fully updated trunk image, you can load SS using the SSLoader configuration map on source.squeak.org. Once loaded, you can launch SS via:
SSRepository classPool at: #Current put: SSRepository defaultRepository. SSRepository classPool at: #Storage put: SSRepository defaultStorage. SSRepository current rootUrl: 'http://localhost:9090/'. SSRepository startUp.
(btw, where are the mutators for Current/Storage?)
And the squeaksource.com repo is open to anybody.
Thanks but I don't want to mess things up (i.e., break stuff in 3.7 etc) in case there are people still interested in it. I feel more comfortable messing up things at source.squeak.org since we only need to maintain the version that we're planning to run ;-)
Has anyone ever migrated a largish source repository to a new image? Anything to watch out for?
Since we have so few projects we could just import all the files again. We did this when we switched to Gemstone at work and it worked all right.
Cheers,
- Andreas