On Tue, 1 Feb 2011, Dale Henrichs wrote:
Jeff,
The best I can tell you is that Metacello was not able to download the OCForOB package from the the omnibrowser repository ... I looked at http://source.wiresong.ca/ob and there is no OCForOB package in that repository either the package was removed or the Metacello configuration is in error.
There used to be the following in the #squeakCommon section of #basline12: in ConfigurationOfOmniBrowser-GuillermoPolito.70:
package: 'OCForOB' with: [ spec repository: 'http://www.squeaksource.com/OCompletion'; requires: #('OCompletion' 'OmniBrowser' 'OB-Standard')].
But now it's just
package: 'OCForOB' with: [ spec requires: #('OCompletion' 'OmniBrowser' 'OB-Standard')];
The repository is specified for Pharo in it's own section, but not for Squeak. Btw both Pharo and Squeak should use the latest version of OCForOB from the OCompletion repository on squeaksource. But first the configuration of OCompletion should be updated and my Metacello knowledge is not enough to do that properly (adding stable versions for both Squeak 4.1 and 4.2).
Looking a little closer, it looks like 4.2 is supposed to use the same set of packages as Pharo which implies that the repository should be 'http://source.lukas-renggli.ch/omnibrowser' in the configuration baseline and not http://source.wiresong.ca/ob. My guess is that the packages were in the package-cache when the configuration was tested.
I doubt that would work. Lukas' version of OB has Pharo specific code which is not compatible with Squeak.
Levente
You could edit the config and make the change repository change yourself (method baseline121:) and try to load it again...
I've cc'ed Guilllermo ...
Dale
On 02/01/2011 11:35 AM, Jeff G wrote:
Hi,
On a fresh image, opening the "Extending the system" workspace and trying to install the omnibrowser results in an error:
Could not resolve: OCForOB
Top of the trace is MetacelloFetchingMCSpecLoader>>error.
I apologize for not producing more detail but I am writing this from my phone and it is fairly tedious as it is. If you need more details please let me know and I'll try to get on a computer and produce them.
Thanks, Jeff
On 2011-02-01 9:47 AM, "Craig Latta" <craig@netjam.org mailto:craig@netjam.org> wrote:
Really nice, Chris. Thanks.-C
-- Craig Latta www.netjam.org/resume http://www.netjam.org/resume
- 31 020 894 6247
- 1 415 287 3547