It's not that I'm apathetic, I just figure you quays are doing a great job and you know better than I do who you want to include on the team. If I vote, I may just screw things up.
Can I vote to abstain?
Sincerely,
Joe.
On Jan 31, 2013, at 4:57 PM, squeak-dev-request@lists.squeakfoundation.org wrote:
Subject: Re: [squeak-dev] Please VOTE!! To: The general-purpose Squeak developers list squeak-dev@lists.squeakfoundation.org Message-ID: 7ECDD4FE-04FD-4693-8904-6AD50C8E4DF2@rowledge.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
98 votes is an alarmingly low turnout - how can candidates feel any sort of mandate with that level of support? Don't leave us all hanging folks - get on the browser and VOTE.
Or I'll have to send my invisible ninja teams out to punish you. They'll (not)appear just as you drift off to sleep. They'll tickle you with such art that you think you're in paradise. And then they'll stop; you'll spend the rest of your life desperately hoping to be tickled that way again. Is it worth such anguish to avoid voting? I think not.
tim
tim Rowledge; tim@rowledge.org; http://www.rowledge.org/tim Useful random insult:- Several nuts over fruitcake minimum.
Hi Joe,
It's a very good point. Last time I handled an election I had everyone answer questions. I didn't do it this time (for a number of reasons). Maybe next election we will add a week between declaring candidates and voting so that we can have a more formal campaign period.
All the best,
Ron Teitelbaum
-----Original Message----- From: squeak-dev-bounces@lists.squeakfoundation.org [mailto:squeak-dev- bounces@lists.squeakfoundation.org] On Behalf Of Joseph J Alotta Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2013 8:32 PM To: squeak-dev@lists.squeakfoundation.org Subject: Re: [squeak-dev] Please VOTE!!
It's not that I'm apathetic, I just figure you quays are doing a great job
and you
know better than I do who you want to include on the team. If I vote, I
may just
screw things up.
Can I vote to abstain?
Sincerely,
Joe.
On Jan 31, 2013, at 4:57 PM, squeak-dev-request@lists.squeakfoundation.org wrote:
Subject: Re: [squeak-dev] Please VOTE!! To: The general-purpose Squeak developers list squeak-dev@lists.squeakfoundation.org Message-ID: 7ECDD4FE-04FD-4693-8904-6AD50C8E4DF2@rowledge.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
98 votes is an alarmingly low turnout - how can candidates feel any sort
of
mandate with that level of support? Don't leave us all hanging folks - get
on the
browser and VOTE.
Or I'll have to send my invisible ninja teams out to punish you. They'll
(not)appear just as you drift off to sleep. They'll tickle you with such
art that you
think you're in paradise. And then they'll stop; you'll spend the rest of
your life
desperately hoping to be tickled that way again. Is it worth such anguish
to
avoid voting? I think not.
tim
tim Rowledge; tim@rowledge.org; http://www.rowledge.org/tim Useful random insult:- Several nuts over fruitcake minimum.
"Joseph" == Joseph J Alotta joseph.alotta@gmail.com writes:
Joseph> Can I vote to abstain?
You can just vote everyone with the same rank, and slightly above "none of the below".
Then, you'll have voted, but with minimal impact. :)
squeak-dev@lists.squeakfoundation.org
-
Joseph J Alotta -
merlyn＠stonehenge.com -
Ron Teitelbaum