Hi All,
So far we have 98 votes! That's 21 votes less than last election. I know we can do better than that. Please take the time to find your ballot and vote. If you need the ballot sent to you again, no problem just let me know at voters@squeak.org.
Friday 8th of February 2013 6PM (23:00 UTC): Online election ends.
The Squeak Oversight Board election ballots have gone out. Please VOTE!!
It's easy to forget or lose track of the email, so please vote while you still know where the email is!
The subject is: Poll: Squeak Oversight Board 2013
Sent on 28th of Jan between 5 and 6pm Eastern Time.
From: andru@cs.cornell.edu; on behalf of; Ron Teitelbaum (CIVS poll supervisor) ron@usmedrec.com
For more information about the election see this page: http://wiki.squeak.org/squeak/6191
Thank you!!
Ron Teitelbaum
98 votes is an alarmingly low turnout - how can candidates feel any sort of mandate with that level of support? Don't leave us all hanging folks - get on the browser and VOTE.
Or I'll have to send my invisible ninja teams out to punish you. They'll (not)appear just as you drift off to sleep. They'll tickle you with such art that you think you're in paradise. And then they'll stop; you'll spend the rest of your life desperately hoping to be tickled that way again. Is it worth such anguish to avoid voting? I think not.
tim -- tim Rowledge; tim@rowledge.org; http://www.rowledge.org/tim Useful random insult:- Several nuts over fruitcake minimum.
HAHAHHAA.....
But you are right, the "community", if exist, should appear here, VOTING!
2013/1/31 tim Rowledge tim@rowledge.org:
98 votes is an alarmingly low turnout - how can candidates feel any sort of mandate with that level of support? Don't leave us all hanging folks - get on the browser and VOTE.
Or I'll have to send my invisible ninja teams out to punish you. They'll (not)appear just as you drift off to sleep. They'll tickle you with such art that you think you're in paradise. And then they'll stop; you'll spend the rest of your life desperately hoping to be tickled that way again. Is it worth such anguish to avoid voting? I think not.
tim
tim Rowledge; tim@rowledge.org; http://www.rowledge.org/tim Useful random insult:- Several nuts over fruitcake minimum.
Am 31.01.2013 21:26, schrieb tim Rowledge:
98 votes is an alarmingly low turnout - how can candidates feel any sort of mandate with that level of support? Don't leave us all hanging folks - get on the browser and VOTE.
Or I'll have to send my invisible ninja teams out to punish you. They'll (not)appear just as you drift off to sleep. They'll tickle you with such art that you think you're in paradise. And then they'll stop; you'll spend the rest of your life desperately hoping to be tickled that way again. Is it worth such anguish to avoid voting? I think not.
frightened into voting. Tough job which I wanted to avoid but with such threats hanging above my head...
Bet of luck to all candidates and everybody please show your support and vote!
Cheers,
Herbert
Hi All,
At the risk of annoying 100 people that have voted. I'm considering sending out the ballots again. The email will not let you vote again (if you try you will get a message that you already voted) but it will be a good reminder for those who haven't voted to vote.
Thoughts?
Ron Teitelbaum
-----Original Message----- From: squeak-dev-bounces@lists.squeakfoundation.org [mailto:squeak-dev- bounces@lists.squeakfoundation.org] On Behalf Of Herbert König Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2013 4:07 PM To: squeak-dev@lists.squeakfoundation.org Subject: Re: [squeak-dev] Please VOTE!!
Am 31.01.2013 21:26, schrieb tim Rowledge:
98 votes is an alarmingly low turnout - how can candidates feel any sort
of
mandate with that level of support? Don't leave us all hanging folks - get
on the
browser and VOTE.
Or I'll have to send my invisible ninja teams out to punish you. They'll
(not)appear just as you drift off to sleep. They'll tickle you with such
art that you
think you're in paradise. And then they'll stop; you'll spend the rest of
your life
desperately hoping to be tickled that way again. Is it worth such anguish
to
avoid voting? I think not.
frightened into voting. Tough job which I wanted to avoid but with such
threats
hanging above my head...
Bet of luck to all candidates and everybody please show your support and
vote!
Cheers,
Herbert
freely spam me ;-) On Jan 31, 2013 10:39 PM, "Ron Teitelbaum" ron@usmedrec.com wrote:
Hi All,
At the risk of annoying 100 people that have voted. I'm considering sending out the ballots again. The email will not let you vote again (if you try you will get a message that you already voted) but it will be a good reminder for those who haven't voted to vote.
Thoughts?
Ron Teitelbaum
-----Original Message----- From: squeak-dev-bounces@lists.squeakfoundation.org [mailto:squeak-dev- bounces@lists.squeakfoundation.org] On Behalf Of Herbert König Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2013 4:07 PM To: squeak-dev@lists.squeakfoundation.org Subject: Re: [squeak-dev] Please VOTE!!
Am 31.01.2013 21:26, schrieb tim Rowledge:
98 votes is an alarmingly low turnout - how can candidates feel any
sort of
mandate with that level of support? Don't leave us all hanging folks -
get on the
browser and VOTE.
Or I'll have to send my invisible ninja teams out to punish you.
They'll
(not)appear just as you drift off to sleep. They'll tickle you with such
art that you
think you're in paradise. And then they'll stop; you'll spend the rest of
your life
desperately hoping to be tickled that way again. Is it worth such anguish
to
avoid voting? I think not.
frightened into voting. Tough job which I wanted to avoid but with such
threats
hanging above my head...
Bet of luck to all candidates and everybody please show your support and
vote!
Cheers,
Herbert
I just voted, thanks for the prodding!
On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 2:38 PM, Ron Teitelbaum ron@usmedrec.com wrote:
Hi All,
At the risk of annoying 100 people that have voted. I'm considering sending out the ballots again. The email will not let you vote again (if you try you will get a message that you already voted) but it will be a good reminder for those who haven't voted to vote.
Thoughts?
Ron Teitelbaum
-----Original Message----- From: squeak-dev-bounces@lists.squeakfoundation.org [mailto:squeak-dev- bounces@lists.squeakfoundation.org] On Behalf Of Herbert König Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2013 4:07 PM To: squeak-dev@lists.squeakfoundation.org Subject: Re: [squeak-dev] Please VOTE!!
Am 31.01.2013 21:26, schrieb tim Rowledge:
98 votes is an alarmingly low turnout - how can candidates feel any
sort of
mandate with that level of support? Don't leave us all hanging folks -
get on the
browser and VOTE.
Or I'll have to send my invisible ninja teams out to punish you.
They'll
(not)appear just as you drift off to sleep. They'll tickle you with such
art that you
think you're in paradise. And then they'll stop; you'll spend the rest of
your life
desperately hoping to be tickled that way again. Is it worth such anguish
to
avoid voting? I think not.
frightened into voting. Tough job which I wanted to avoid but with such
threats
hanging above my head...
Bet of luck to all candidates and everybody please show your support and
vote!
Cheers,
Herbert
On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 1:38 PM, Ron Teitelbaum ron@usmedrec.com wrote:
Hi All,
At the risk of annoying 100 people that have voted. I'm considering sending out the ballots again. The email will not let you vote again (if you try you will get a message that you already voted) but it will be a good reminder for those who haven't voted to vote.
Thoughts?
do it. Use capitals in the subject line.
Ron Teitelbaum
-----Original Message----- From: squeak-dev-bounces@lists.squeakfoundation.org [mailto:squeak-dev- bounces@lists.squeakfoundation.org] On Behalf Of Herbert König Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2013 4:07 PM To: squeak-dev@lists.squeakfoundation.org Subject: Re: [squeak-dev] Please VOTE!!
Am 31.01.2013 21:26, schrieb tim Rowledge:
98 votes is an alarmingly low turnout - how can candidates feel any
sort of
mandate with that level of support? Don't leave us all hanging folks -
get on the
browser and VOTE.
Or I'll have to send my invisible ninja teams out to punish you.
They'll
(not)appear just as you drift off to sleep. They'll tickle you with such
art that you
think you're in paradise. And then they'll stop; you'll spend the rest of
your life
desperately hoping to be tickled that way again. Is it worth such anguish
to
avoid voting? I think not.
frightened into voting. Tough job which I wanted to avoid but with such
threats
hanging above my head...
Bet of luck to all candidates and everybody please show your support and
vote!
Cheers,
Herbert
Ron,
At the risk of annoying 100 people that have voted. I'm considering sending out the ballots again. The email will not let you vote again (if you try you will get a message that you already voted) but it will be a good reminder for those who haven't voted to vote.
The problem isn't annoying people, but confusing them. A second ballot that doesn't work will get you lots of questions by people who aren't paying enough attention.
Didn't you set the deadline as February 8th? That is still over a week away and we are already pretty close to the historical turnout rate. I think more reminders here on squeak-dev closer to the deadline would be good enough.
About the candidates, I would like to say that it was a really great list and I would love to have any one of them on the Board. Thank you for all who decided to run and thanks to Ron for doing the election this year. I didn't run this year since I am six months behind in my PhD project, but look forward to being able to run next year.
-- Jecel
I think getting just one ballot is better. Simple and clean.
On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 3:38 PM, Ron Teitelbaum ron@usmedrec.com wrote:
Hi All,
At the risk of annoying 100 people that have voted. I'm considering sending out the ballots again. The email will not let you vote again (if you try you will get a message that you already voted) but it will be a good reminder for those who haven't voted to vote.
Thoughts?
Ron Teitelbaum
-----Original Message----- From: squeak-dev-bounces@lists.squeakfoundation.org [mailto:squeak-dev- bounces@lists.squeakfoundation.org] On Behalf Of Herbert König Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2013 4:07 PM To: squeak-dev@lists.squeakfoundation.org Subject: Re: [squeak-dev] Please VOTE!!
Am 31.01.2013 21:26, schrieb tim Rowledge:
98 votes is an alarmingly low turnout - how can candidates feel any sort
of
mandate with that level of support? Don't leave us all hanging folks - get
on the
browser and VOTE.
Or I'll have to send my invisible ninja teams out to punish you. They'll
(not)appear just as you drift off to sleep. They'll tickle you with such
art that you
think you're in paradise. And then they'll stop; you'll spend the rest of
your life
desperately hoping to be tickled that way again. Is it worth such anguish
to
avoid voting? I think not.
frightened into voting. Tough job which I wanted to avoid but with such
threats
hanging above my head...
Bet of luck to all candidates and everybody please show your support and
vote!
Cheers,
Herbert
squeak-dev@lists.squeakfoundation.org
-
Chris Muller -
Eliot Miranda -
Enrico Spinielli -
Germán Arduino -
Herbert König -
Jecel Assumpcao Jr. -
Jeff Gonis -
Ron Teitelbaum -
tim Rowledge